Colorado Springs, CO vs San Jose, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Jose, CA spends 36% more per resident than Colorado Springs, CO: $17,934 against $13,222. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
San Jose, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 59/100 (grade C) for Colorado Springs, CO — a 31-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
San Jose, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Colorado Springs, CO carries $3,063 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266 per resident, while San Jose, CA leads with parks and recreation at $1,424.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Colorado Springs, CO at 13% of total revenue, whereas San Jose, CA relies most on other revenue at 9%.
Summary
San Jose spends 26.3% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($4,712/person difference). San Jose, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $40 |
| Sales Tax | $257 | $315 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,935 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $2,680 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $608 |
| Other | $2,678 | $3,519 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $810 |
| Health | $0 | $609 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $1,254 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $1,424 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $4,897 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $161 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $2,533 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $0 |
| Other | $5,120 | $6,247 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.