San Jose, CA vs Albuquerque, NM
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Jose, CA and Albuquerque, NM spend within 4.0% of each other per resident — $17,934 versus $17,237 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
San Jose, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 81/100 (grade A) for Albuquerque, NM — a 9-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
San Jose, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Albuquerque, NM carries $613 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Jose, CA at $1,424 per resident and in Albuquerque, NM at $1,990.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in San Jose, CA at 9% of total revenue, whereas Albuquerque, NM relies most on charges and fees at 11%.
Summary
San Jose spends 4.0% more per capita than Albuquerque ($697/person difference). San Jose, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $40 | $36 |
| Sales Tax | $315 | $355 |
| Income Tax | $1,935 | $1,580 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,680 | $1,897 |
| Charges & Fees | $608 | $2,633 |
| Other | $3,519 | $2,174 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $440 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $172 |
| Public Welfare | $810 | $419 |
| Health | $609 | $291 |
| Hospitals | $1,254 | $328 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,424 | $1,990 |
| Housing | $4,897 | $4,080 |
| Sewerage | $161 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,533 | $5,212 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,096 |
| Other | $6,247 | $3,209 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.