Albuquerque, NM vs San Jose, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Jose, CA and Albuquerque, NM spend within 4.0% of each other per resident — $17,934 versus $17,237 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
San Jose, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 81/100 (grade A) for Albuquerque, NM — a 9-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
San Jose, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Albuquerque, NM carries $613 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Albuquerque, NM at $1,990 per resident and in San Jose, CA at $1,424.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Albuquerque, NM at 11% of total revenue, whereas San Jose, CA relies most on other revenue at 9%.
Summary
San Jose spends 3.9% more per capita than Albuquerque ($697/person difference). San Jose, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $36 | $40 |
| Sales Tax | $355 | $315 |
| Income Tax | $1,580 | $1,935 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,897 | $2,680 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,633 | $608 |
| Other | $2,174 | $3,519 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $440 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $172 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $419 | $810 |
| Health | $291 | $609 |
| Hospitals | $328 | $1,254 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,990 | $1,424 |
| Housing | $4,080 | $4,897 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $161 |
| Utilities | $5,212 | $2,533 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,096 | $0 |
| Other | $3,209 | $6,247 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.