San Francisco, CA vs Miami, FL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Francisco, CA outspends Miami, FL by a wide margin per resident — $184,131 versus $28,195, a 553% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Miami, FL edges San Francisco, CA on the Fiscal Health Score by 5 points — 53/100 (grade C) to 48/100 (grade D). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Miami, FL reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while San Francisco, CA carries $2,031 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: San Francisco, CA leads with parks and recreation at $4,119 per resident, while Miami, FL leads with fire protection at $7,399.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 7% of total revenue in San Francisco, CA and 100% in Miami, FL.
Summary
San Francisco spends 553.1% more per capita than Miami ($155,936/person difference). Miami, FL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 53/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $148 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $3,028 | $1,647 |
| Income Tax | $269 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $19,762 | $15,037 |
| Charges & Fees | $7,961 | $0 |
| Other | $18,918 | $1,399 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,351 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,281 | $7,399 |
| Public Welfare | $2,203 | $109 |
| Health | $1,911 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $6,939 | $1,499 |
| Parks & Recreation | $4,119 | $1,783 |
| Housing | $9,315 | $6,840 |
| Sewerage | $1,423 | $699 |
| Utilities | $21,190 | $1,295 |
| Interest on Debt | $22,798 | $0 |
| General Admin | $14,899 | $0 |
| Other | $93,702 | $8,572 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.