San Francisco, CA vs Colorado Springs, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
San Francisco spends 1292.6% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($170,909/person difference). Colorado Springs, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).
Fiscal Health Score
D
48/100
Budget Balance70
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
C
59/100
Budget Balance54
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
San Francisco
Colorado Springs
Total Spending
$156.7B
$6.3B
Spending / Capita
$184,131
$13,222
Total Revenue
$232.3B
$25.3B
Revenue / Capita
$272,907
$52,777
Total Debt
$1.7B
$1.5B
Debt / Capita
$2,031
$3,063
Population
851,036
479,612
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
San Francisco$3,351
Colorado Springs$0
Fire Protection
San Francisco$2,281
Colorado Springs$1,266
Parks & Recreation
San Francisco$4,119
Colorado Springs$376
Health
San Francisco$1,911
Colorado Springs$0
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
San FranciscoColorado Springs
| Property Tax | $148 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $3,028 | $257 |
| Income Tax | $269 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $19,762 | $6,902 |
| Charges & Fees | $7,961 | $5,676 |
| Other | $18,918 | $2,678 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
San FranciscoColorado Springs
| Police | $3,351 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,281 | $1,266 |
| Public Welfare | $2,203 | $575 |
| Health | $1,911 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $6,939 | $416 |
| Parks & Recreation | $4,119 | $376 |
| Housing | $9,315 | $2,713 |
| Sewerage | $1,423 | $0 |
| Utilities | $21,190 | $2,566 |
| Interest on Debt | $22,798 | $190 |
| General Admin | $14,899 | $0 |
| Other | $93,702 | $5,120 |
D
San Francisco, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 48/100
Below average fiscal health
C
Colorado Springs, CO
Fiscal Health Score: 59/100
Average fiscal health