Colorado Springs, CO vs San Francisco, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
San Francisco spends 92.8% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($170,909/person difference). Colorado Springs, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).
Fiscal Health Score
C
59/100
Budget Balance54
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
D
48/100
Budget Balance70
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Colorado Springs
San Francisco
Total Spending
$6.3B
$156.7B
Spending / Capita
$13,222
$184,131
Total Revenue
$25.3B
$232.3B
Revenue / Capita
$52,777
$272,907
Total Debt
$1.5B
$1.7B
Debt / Capita
$3,063
$2,031
Population
479,612
851,036
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Colorado Springs$0
San Francisco$3,351
Fire Protection
Colorado Springs$1,266
San Francisco$2,281
Parks & Recreation
Colorado Springs$376
San Francisco$4,119
Health
Colorado Springs$0
San Francisco$1,911
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
Colorado SpringsSan Francisco
| Property Tax | $0 | $148 |
| Sales Tax | $257 | $3,028 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $269 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $19,762 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $7,961 |
| Other | $2,678 | $18,918 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
Colorado SpringsSan Francisco
| Police | $0 | $3,351 |
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $2,281 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $2,203 |
| Health | $0 | $1,911 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $6,939 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $4,119 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $9,315 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $1,423 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $21,190 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $22,798 |
| General Admin | $0 | $14,899 |
| Other | $5,120 | $93,702 |
C
Colorado Springs, CO
Fiscal Health Score: 59/100
Average fiscal health
D
San Francisco, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 48/100
Below average fiscal health