San Antonio, TX vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
San Antonio spends 51.5% more per capita than Omaha ($5,763/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
B
68/100
Budget Balance93
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
San Antonio
Omaha
Total Spending
$24.5B
$5.5B
Spending / Capita
$16,943
$11,180
Total Revenue
$124.1B
$13.2B
Revenue / Capita
$85,853
$26,929
Total Debt
$3.1B
$0
Debt / Capita
$2,131
$0
Population
1,445,662
489,201
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Fire Protection
San Antonio$396
Omaha$0
Highways & Roads
San Antonio$158
Omaha$319
Parks & Recreation
San Antonio$1,045
Omaha$742
Education
San Antonio$23
Omaha$0
Health
San Antonio$293
Omaha$456
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
San AntonioOmaha
| Property Tax | $9 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $293 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $1,000 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,312 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,025 | $0 |
| Other | $3,184 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
San AntonioOmaha
| Fire Protection | $396 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $158 | $319 |
| Education | $23 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,188 | $1,521 |
| Health | $293 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $993 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,045 | $742 |
| Housing | $3,570 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $100 | $0 |
| Utilities | $3,826 | $581 |
| Other | $5,352 | $4,516 |
B
San Antonio, TX
Fiscal Health Score: 68/100
Good fiscal health
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health