Omaha, NE vs San Antonio, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Antonio, TX spends 52% more per resident than Omaha, NE: $16,943 against $11,180. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 68/100 (grade B) for San Antonio, TX — a 22-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while San Antonio, TX carries $2,131 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Omaha, NE at $742 per resident and in San Antonio, TX at $1,045.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Omaha, NE at 17% of total revenue, whereas San Antonio, TX relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 17%.
Summary
San Antonio spends 34.0% more per capita than Omaha ($5,763/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $9 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $293 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,000 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $14,312 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $4,025 |
| Other | $4,672 | $3,184 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $396 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $158 |
| Education | $0 | $23 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $1,188 |
| Health | $456 | $293 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $993 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $1,045 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $3,570 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $100 |
| Utilities | $581 | $3,826 |
| Other | $4,516 | $5,352 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.