Omaha, NE vs San Antonio, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
San Antonio spends 34.0% more per capita than Omaha ($5,763/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
B
68/100
Budget Balance93
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Omaha
San Antonio
Total Spending
$5.5B
$24.5B
Spending / Capita
$11,180
$16,943
Total Revenue
$13.2B
$124.1B
Revenue / Capita
$26,929
$85,853
Total Debt
$0
$3.1B
Debt / Capita
$0
$2,131
Population
489,201
1,445,662
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Fire Protection
Omaha$0
San Antonio$396
Highways & Roads
Omaha$319
San Antonio$158
Parks & Recreation
Omaha$742
San Antonio$1,045
Education
Omaha$0
San Antonio$23
Health
Omaha$456
San Antonio$293
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaSan Antonio
| Property Tax | $624 | $9 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $293 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,000 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $14,312 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $4,025 |
| Other | $4,672 | $3,184 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaSan Antonio
| Fire Protection | $0 | $396 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $158 |
| Education | $0 | $23 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $1,188 |
| Health | $456 | $293 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $993 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $1,045 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $3,570 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $100 |
| Utilities | $581 | $3,826 |
| Other | $4,516 | $5,352 |
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
B
San Antonio, TX
Fiscal Health Score: 68/100
Good fiscal health