San Antonio, TX vs Oklahoma City, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oklahoma City, OK and San Antonio, TX spend within 6.7% of each other per resident — $18,074 versus $16,943 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
San Antonio, TX edges Oklahoma City, OK on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 68/100 (grade B) to 65/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, San Antonio, TX carries the lighter load at $2,131 per resident versus $3,520 for Oklahoma City, OK. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Antonio, TX at $1,045 per resident and in Oklahoma City, OK at $2,014.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 17% of total revenue in San Antonio, TX and 19% in Oklahoma City, OK.
Summary
Oklahoma City spends 6.3% more per capita than San Antonio ($1,131/person difference). San Antonio, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $9 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $293 | $763 |
| Income Tax | $1,000 | $1,037 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,312 | $6,852 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,025 | $3,256 |
| Other | $3,184 | $1,836 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $396 | $513 |
| Highways & Roads | $158 | $0 |
| Education | $23 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,188 | $1,525 |
| Health | $293 | $5 |
| Hospitals | $993 | $2,044 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,045 | $2,014 |
| Housing | $3,570 | $2,857 |
| Sewerage | $100 | $0 |
| Utilities | $3,826 | $4,523 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $707 |
| Other | $5,352 | $3,886 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.