Oklahoma City, OK vs San Antonio, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oklahoma City, OK and San Antonio, TX spend within 6.7% of each other per resident — $18,074 versus $16,943 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
San Antonio, TX edges Oklahoma City, OK on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 68/100 (grade B) to 65/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, San Antonio, TX carries the lighter load at $2,131 per resident versus $3,520 for Oklahoma City, OK. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Oklahoma City, OK at $2,014 per resident and in San Antonio, TX at $1,045.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 19% of total revenue in Oklahoma City, OK and 17% in San Antonio, TX.
Summary
Oklahoma City spends 6.7% more per capita than San Antonio ($1,131/person difference). San Antonio, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $9 |
| Sales Tax | $763 | $293 |
| Income Tax | $1,037 | $1,000 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,852 | $14,312 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,256 | $4,025 |
| Other | $1,836 | $3,184 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $513 | $396 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $158 |
| Education | $0 | $23 |
| Public Welfare | $1,525 | $1,188 |
| Health | $5 | $293 |
| Hospitals | $2,044 | $993 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,014 | $1,045 |
| Housing | $2,857 | $3,570 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $100 |
| Utilities | $4,523 | $3,826 |
| Interest on Debt | $707 | $0 |
| Other | $3,886 | $5,352 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.