San Antonio, TX vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN spends 29% more per resident than San Antonio, TX: $21,910 against $16,943. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
San Antonio, TX edges Minneapolis, MN on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 68/100 (grade B) to 65/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Minneapolis, MN carries the lighter load at $644 per resident versus $2,131 for San Antonio, TX. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Antonio, TX at $1,045 per resident and in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in San Antonio, TX at 17% of total revenue, whereas Minneapolis, MN relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 22.7% more per capita than San Antonio ($4,967/person difference). San Antonio, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $9 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $293 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $1,000 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,312 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,025 | $2,040 |
| Other | $3,184 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $396 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $158 | $221 |
| Education | $23 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,188 | $1,500 |
| Health | $293 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $993 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,045 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $3,570 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $100 | $570 |
| Utilities | $3,826 | $2,398 |
| Other | $5,352 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.