Minneapolis, MN vs San Antonio, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN spends 29% more per resident than San Antonio, TX: $21,910 against $16,943. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
San Antonio, TX edges Minneapolis, MN on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 68/100 (grade B) to 65/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Minneapolis, MN carries the lighter load at $644 per resident versus $2,131 for San Antonio, TX. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486 per resident and in San Antonio, TX at $1,045.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Minneapolis, MN at 17% of total revenue, whereas San Antonio, TX relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 17%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 29.3% more per capita than San Antonio ($4,967/person difference). San Antonio, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $9 |
| Sales Tax | $1,989 | $293 |
| Income Tax | $994 | $1,000 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,929 | $14,312 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,040 | $4,025 |
| Other | $3,254 | $3,184 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $683 | $396 |
| Highways & Roads | $221 | $158 |
| Education | $0 | $23 |
| Public Welfare | $1,500 | $1,188 |
| Health | $0 | $293 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $993 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,486 | $1,045 |
| Housing | $4,133 | $3,570 |
| Sewerage | $570 | $100 |
| Utilities | $2,398 | $3,826 |
| Other | $8,919 | $5,352 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.