Sacramento, CA vs Raleigh, NC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Sacramento, CA outspends Raleigh, NC by a wide margin per resident — $71,020 versus $13,911, a 411% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Raleigh, NC holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 76/100 (grade B) against 57/100 (grade C) for Sacramento, CA — a 19-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Sacramento, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Raleigh, NC carries $906 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Sacramento, CA leads with police at $5,402 per resident, while Raleigh, NC leads with parks and recreation at $1,391.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Sacramento, CA at 8% of total revenue, whereas Raleigh, NC relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 47%.
Summary
Sacramento spends 410.5% more per capita than Raleigh ($57,109/person difference). Raleigh, NC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 76/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,465 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $378 | $858 |
| Income Tax | $3,104 | $806 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,400 | $14,128 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,239 | $2,681 |
| Other | $5,072 | $4,740 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $5,402 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,466 | $277 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $448 |
| Education | $2,684 | $6 |
| Public Welfare | $3,470 | $498 |
| Health | $18 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $669 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,437 | $1,391 |
| Housing | $8,577 | $2,712 |
| Sewerage | $103 | $281 |
| Utilities | $19,920 | $2,469 |
| Interest on Debt | $162 | $1,513 |
| Other | $26,782 | $3,646 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.