Raleigh, NC vs Sacramento, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Sacramento, CA outspends Raleigh, NC by a wide margin per resident — $71,020 versus $13,911, a 411% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Raleigh, NC holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 76/100 (grade B) against 57/100 (grade C) for Sacramento, CA — a 19-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Sacramento, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Raleigh, NC carries $906 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Raleigh, NC leads with parks and recreation at $1,391 per resident, while Sacramento, CA leads with police at $5,402.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Raleigh, NC at 47% of total revenue, whereas Sacramento, CA relies most on other revenue at 8%.
Summary
Sacramento spends 80.4% more per capita than Raleigh ($57,109/person difference). Raleigh, NC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 76/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1,465 |
| Sales Tax | $858 | $378 |
| Income Tax | $806 | $3,104 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,128 | $3,400 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,681 | $3,239 |
| Other | $4,740 | $5,072 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $5,402 |
| Fire Protection | $277 | $2,466 |
| Highways & Roads | $448 | $0 |
| Education | $6 | $2,684 |
| Public Welfare | $498 | $3,470 |
| Health | $0 | $18 |
| Hospitals | $669 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,391 | $1,437 |
| Housing | $2,712 | $8,577 |
| Sewerage | $281 | $103 |
| Utilities | $2,469 | $19,920 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,513 | $162 |
| Other | $3,646 | $26,782 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.