Sacramento, CA vs Kansas City, MO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Sacramento, CA outspends Kansas City, MO by a wide margin per resident — $71,020 versus $22,820, a 211% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Sacramento, CA edges Kansas City, MO on the Fiscal Health Score by 5 points — 57/100 (grade C) to 52/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Sacramento, CA leads with police at $5,402 per resident, while Kansas City, MO leads with parks and recreation at $1,309.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 8% of total revenue in Sacramento, CA and 835% in Kansas City, MO.
Summary
Sacramento spends 211.2% more per capita than Kansas City ($48,201/person difference). Sacramento, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 57/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,465 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $378 | $623 |
| Income Tax | $3,104 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,400 | $7 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,239 | $3,794 |
| Other | $5,072 | $11,150 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $5,402 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,466 | $119 |
| Education | $2,684 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $3,470 | $3,018 |
| Health | $18 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,849 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,437 | $1,309 |
| Housing | $8,577 | $4,681 |
| Sewerage | $103 | $0 |
| Utilities | $19,920 | $3,123 |
| Interest on Debt | $162 | $0 |
| Other | $26,782 | $8,721 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.