Kansas City, MO vs Sacramento, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Sacramento, CA outspends Kansas City, MO by a wide margin per resident — $71,020 versus $22,820, a 211% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Sacramento, CA edges Kansas City, MO on the Fiscal Health Score by 5 points — 57/100 (grade C) to 52/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Kansas City, MO leads with parks and recreation at $1,309 per resident, while Sacramento, CA leads with police at $5,402.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 835% of total revenue in Kansas City, MO and 8% in Sacramento, CA.
Summary
Sacramento spends 67.9% more per capita than Kansas City ($48,201/person difference). Sacramento, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 57/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1,465 |
| Sales Tax | $623 | $378 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $3,104 |
| Intergovernmental | $7 | $3,400 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,794 | $3,239 |
| Other | $11,150 | $5,072 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $5,402 |
| Fire Protection | $119 | $2,466 |
| Education | $0 | $2,684 |
| Public Welfare | $3,018 | $3,470 |
| Health | $0 | $18 |
| Hospitals | $1,849 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,309 | $1,437 |
| Housing | $4,681 | $8,577 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $103 |
| Utilities | $3,123 | $19,920 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $162 |
| Other | $8,721 | $26,782 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.