Sacramento, CA vs Bakersfield, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Sacramento, CA outspends Bakersfield, CA by a wide margin per resident — $71,020 versus $11,576, a 514% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Sacramento, CA edges Bakersfield, CA on the Fiscal Health Score by 1 points — 57/100 (grade C) to 56/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Sacramento, CA leads with police at $5,402 per resident, while Bakersfield, CA leads with parks and recreation at $741.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Sacramento, CA at 8% of total revenue, whereas Bakersfield, CA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Sacramento spends 513.5% more per capita than Bakersfield ($59,445/person difference). Sacramento, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 57/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,465 | $1 |
| Sales Tax | $378 | $20 |
| Income Tax | $3,104 | $1,909 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,400 | $3,862 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,239 | $1,024 |
| Other | $5,072 | $1,915 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $5,402 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,466 | $0 |
| Education | $2,684 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $3,470 | $840 |
| Health | $18 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $425 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,437 | $741 |
| Housing | $8,577 | $3,391 |
| Sewerage | $103 | $265 |
| Utilities | $19,920 | $2,679 |
| Interest on Debt | $162 | $0 |
| Other | $26,782 | $3,234 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.