Bakersfield, CA vs Sacramento, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Sacramento, CA outspends Bakersfield, CA by a wide margin per resident — $71,020 versus $11,576, a 514% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Sacramento, CA edges Bakersfield, CA on the Fiscal Health Score by 1 points — 57/100 (grade C) to 56/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Bakersfield, CA leads with parks and recreation at $741 per resident, while Sacramento, CA leads with police at $5,402.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Bakersfield, CA at 100% of total revenue, whereas Sacramento, CA relies most on other revenue at 8%.
Summary
Sacramento spends 83.7% more per capita than Bakersfield ($59,445/person difference). Sacramento, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 57/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1 | $1,465 |
| Sales Tax | $20 | $378 |
| Income Tax | $1,909 | $3,104 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,862 | $3,400 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,024 | $3,239 |
| Other | $1,915 | $5,072 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $5,402 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $2,466 |
| Education | $0 | $2,684 |
| Public Welfare | $840 | $3,470 |
| Health | $0 | $18 |
| Hospitals | $425 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $741 | $1,437 |
| Housing | $3,391 | $8,577 |
| Sewerage | $265 | $103 |
| Utilities | $2,679 | $19,920 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $162 |
| Other | $3,234 | $26,782 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.