Rogers, AR vs Fort Smith, AR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fort Smith, AR spends 28% more per resident than Rogers, AR: $14,015 against $10,936. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Fort Smith, AR edges Rogers, AR on the Fiscal Health Score by 2 points — 69/100 (grade B) to 67/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Rogers, AR carries the lighter load at $533 per resident versus $1,000 for Fort Smith, AR. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Rogers, AR at $1,039 per resident and in Fort Smith, AR at $549.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Rogers, AR at 49% of total revenue, whereas Fort Smith, AR relies most on other revenue at 13%.
Summary
Fort Smith spends 22.0% more per capita than Rogers ($3,079/person difference). Fort Smith, AR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 69/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $3 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $262 | $143 |
| Income Tax | $47 | $2,263 |
| Intergovernmental | $11,941 | $40 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,584 | $3,270 |
| Other | $2,887 | $3,396 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $473 | $295 |
| Highways & Roads | $38 | $0 |
| Education | $24 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,032 | $788 |
| Health | $326 | $375 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $185 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,039 | $549 |
| Housing | $1,969 | $2,224 |
| Sewerage | $94 | $0 |
| Utilities | $1,452 | $4,214 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $291 |
| Other | $4,488 | $5,094 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.