Fort Smith, AR vs Rogers, AR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fort Smith, AR spends 28% more per resident than Rogers, AR: $14,015 against $10,936. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Fort Smith, AR edges Rogers, AR on the Fiscal Health Score by 2 points — 69/100 (grade B) to 67/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Rogers, AR carries the lighter load at $533 per resident versus $1,000 for Fort Smith, AR. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Fort Smith, AR at $549 per resident and in Rogers, AR at $1,039.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Fort Smith, AR at 13% of total revenue, whereas Rogers, AR relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 49%.
Summary
Fort Smith spends 28.2% more per capita than Rogers ($3,079/person difference). Fort Smith, AR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 69/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $3 |
| Sales Tax | $143 | $262 |
| Income Tax | $2,263 | $47 |
| Intergovernmental | $40 | $11,941 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,270 | $2,584 |
| Other | $3,396 | $2,887 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $295 | $473 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $38 |
| Education | $0 | $24 |
| Public Welfare | $788 | $1,032 |
| Health | $375 | $326 |
| Hospitals | $185 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $549 | $1,039 |
| Housing | $2,224 | $1,969 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $94 |
| Utilities | $4,214 | $1,452 |
| Interest on Debt | $291 | $0 |
| Other | $5,094 | $4,488 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.