Rochester, MN vs Brooklyn Park, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Rochester spends 26.3% more per capita than Brooklyn Park ($2,875/person difference). Rochester, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 86/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,144 | $520 |
| Sales Tax | $1,029 | $753 |
| Intergovernmental | $120 | $228 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,283 | $2,265 |
| Other | $6,193 | $411 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $445 | $201 |
| Public Welfare | $1,563 | $752 |
| Health | $673 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $407 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,257 | $1,618 |
| Housing | $3,160 | $3,434 |
| Utilities | $957 | $2,176 |
| Interest on Debt | $971 | $0 |
| Other | $4,771 | $2,333 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.