Rochester, MN vs Brooklyn Park, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Rochester, MN spends 26% more per resident than Brooklyn Park, MN: $13,796 against $10,921. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Rochester, MN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 86/100 (grade A) against 56/100 (grade C) for Brooklyn Park, MN — a 30-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Brooklyn Park, MN carries the lighter load at $409 per resident versus $573 for Rochester, MN. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Rochester, MN at $1,257 per resident and in Brooklyn Park, MN at $1,618.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Rochester, MN at 21% of total revenue, whereas Brooklyn Park, MN relies most on charges and fees at 52%.
Summary
Rochester spends 26.3% more per capita than Brooklyn Park ($2,875/person difference). Rochester, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 86/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,144 | $520 |
| Sales Tax | $1,029 | $753 |
| Intergovernmental | $120 | $228 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,283 | $2,265 |
| Other | $6,193 | $411 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $445 | $201 |
| Public Welfare | $1,563 | $752 |
| Health | $673 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $407 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,257 | $1,618 |
| Housing | $3,160 | $3,434 |
| Utilities | $957 | $2,176 |
| Interest on Debt | $971 | $0 |
| Other | $4,771 | $2,333 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.