Brooklyn Park, MN vs Rochester, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Rochester spends 20.8% more per capita than Brooklyn Park ($2,875/person difference). Rochester, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 86/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $520 | $1,144 |
| Sales Tax | $753 | $1,029 |
| Intergovernmental | $228 | $120 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,265 | $1,283 |
| Other | $411 | $6,193 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $201 | $445 |
| Public Welfare | $752 | $1,563 |
| Health | $0 | $673 |
| Hospitals | $407 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,618 | $1,257 |
| Housing | $3,434 | $3,160 |
| Utilities | $2,176 | $957 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $971 |
| Other | $2,333 | $4,771 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.