Reading, PA vs Pittsburgh, PA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Pittsburgh, PA spends 55% more per resident than Reading, PA: $25,349 against $16,327. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Reading, PA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 86/100 (grade A) against 69/100 (grade B) for Pittsburgh, PA — a 17-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Pittsburgh, PA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Reading, PA carries $87 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Reading, PA leads with parks and recreation at $826 per resident, while Pittsburgh, PA leads with fire protection at $784.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Reading, PA at 28% of total revenue, whereas Pittsburgh, PA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 14%.
Summary
Pittsburgh spends 35.6% more per capita than Reading ($9,022/person difference). Reading, PA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 86/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $47 | $35 |
| Sales Tax | $60 | $201 |
| Income Tax | $956 | $31 |
| Intergovernmental | $767 | $2,136 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,742 | $0 |
| Other | $6,157 | $1,184 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $256 | $784 |
| Highways & Roads | $92 | $605 |
| Public Welfare | $1,502 | $4,568 |
| Health | $180 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $672 | $214 |
| Parks & Recreation | $826 | $399 |
| Housing | $4,415 | $4,276 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $248 |
| Utilities | $3,304 | $690 |
| Other | $5,080 | $13,566 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.