Pittsburgh, PA vs Reading, PA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Pittsburgh spends 55.3% more per capita than Reading ($9,022/person difference). Reading, PA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 86/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $35 | $47 |
| Sales Tax | $201 | $60 |
| Income Tax | $31 | $956 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,136 | $767 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,742 |
| Other | $1,184 | $6,157 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $784 | $256 |
| Highways & Roads | $605 | $92 |
| Public Welfare | $4,568 | $1,502 |
| Health | $0 | $180 |
| Hospitals | $214 | $672 |
| Parks & Recreation | $399 | $826 |
| Housing | $4,276 | $4,415 |
| Sewerage | $248 | $0 |
| Utilities | $690 | $3,304 |
| Other | $13,566 | $5,080 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.