Portland, OR vs Fresno, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fresno, CA outspends Portland, OR by a wide margin per resident — $43,387 versus $23,675, a 83% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Portland, OR holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 63/100 (grade C) against 50/100 (grade C) for Fresno, CA — a 13-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Fresno, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Portland, OR carries $1,574 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Portland, OR leads with parks and recreation at $2,477 per resident, while Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Portland, OR at 19% of total revenue, whereas Fresno, CA relies most on other revenue at 19%.
Summary
Fresno spends 45.4% more per capita than Portland ($19,712/person difference). Portland, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $337 |
| Sales Tax | $1,695 | $19 |
| Income Tax | $130 | $501 |
| Intergovernmental | $8,979 | -$4,470 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,883 | $11 |
| Other | $7,916 | $2,070 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $3,261 |
| Fire Protection | $1,700 | $568 |
| Highways & Roads | $139 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $3,942 |
| Public Welfare | $3,607 | $1,946 |
| Health | $0 | $599 |
| Hospitals | $2,893 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,477 | $76 |
| Housing | $3,694 | $2,856 |
| Sewerage | $630 | $0 |
| Utilities | $1,845 | $15,340 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $255 |
| Other | $6,689 | $14,545 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.