Fresno, CA vs Portland, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fresno, CA outspends Portland, OR by a wide margin per resident — $43,387 versus $23,675, a 83% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Portland, OR holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 63/100 (grade C) against 50/100 (grade C) for Fresno, CA — a 13-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Fresno, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Portland, OR carries $1,574 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Fresno, CA leads with education at $3,942 per resident, while Portland, OR leads with parks and recreation at $2,477.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Fresno, CA at 19% of total revenue, whereas Portland, OR relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 19%.
Summary
Fresno spends 83.3% more per capita than Portland ($19,712/person difference). Portland, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $337 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $19 | $1,695 |
| Income Tax | $501 | $130 |
| Intergovernmental | -$4,470 | $8,979 |
| Charges & Fees | $11 | $3,883 |
| Other | $2,070 | $7,916 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,261 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $568 | $1,700 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $139 |
| Education | $3,942 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,946 | $3,607 |
| Health | $599 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $2,893 |
| Parks & Recreation | $76 | $2,477 |
| Housing | $2,856 | $3,694 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $630 |
| Utilities | $15,340 | $1,845 |
| Interest on Debt | $255 | $0 |
| Other | $14,545 | $6,689 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.