Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Portland, OR vs Bakersfield, CA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Portland spends 104.5% more per capita than Bakersfield ($12,099/person difference). Portland, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Portland, OR
Pop. 646,101
C
63/100
Budget Balance83
Debt Burden7
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency72
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Bakersfield, CA
Pop. 404,321
C
56/100
Budget Balance2
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Portland
Bakersfield
Total Spending
$15.3B
$4.7B
Spending / Capita
$23,675
$11,576
Total Revenue
$31.0B
$1.6B
Revenue / Capita
$47,970
$3,862
Total Debt
$1.0B
$0
Debt / Capita
$1,574
$0
Population
646,101
404,321
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Portland$1,700
Bakersfield$0
Highways & Roads
Portland$139
Bakersfield$0
Parks & Recreation
Portland$2,477
Bakersfield$741

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

PortlandBakersfield
Property Tax
$0
$1
Sales Tax
$1,695
$20
Income Tax
$130
$1,909
Intergovernmental
$8,979
$3,862
Charges & Fees
$3,883
$1,024
Other
$7,916
$1,915

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

PortlandBakersfield
Fire Protection
$1,700
$0
Highways & Roads
$139
$0
Public Welfare
$3,607
$840
Hospitals
$2,893
$425
Parks & Recreation
$2,477
$741
Housing
$3,694
$3,391
Sewerage
$630
$265
Utilities
$1,845
$2,679
Other
$6,689
$3,234
C
Portland, OR
Fiscal Health Score: 63/100
Average fiscal health
C
Bakersfield, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities