Bakersfield, CA vs Portland, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Portland, OR outspends Bakersfield, CA by a wide margin per resident — $23,675 versus $11,576, a 105% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Portland, OR edges Bakersfield, CA on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 63/100 (grade C) to 56/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Bakersfield, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Portland, OR carries $1,574 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Bakersfield, CA at $741 per resident and in Portland, OR at $2,477.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Bakersfield, CA and 19% in Portland, OR.
Summary
Portland spends 51.1% more per capita than Bakersfield ($12,099/person difference). Portland, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $20 | $1,695 |
| Income Tax | $1,909 | $130 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,862 | $8,979 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,024 | $3,883 |
| Other | $1,915 | $7,916 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $1,700 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $139 |
| Public Welfare | $840 | $3,607 |
| Hospitals | $425 | $2,893 |
| Parks & Recreation | $741 | $2,477 |
| Housing | $3,391 | $3,694 |
| Sewerage | $265 | $630 |
| Utilities | $2,679 | $1,845 |
| Other | $3,234 | $6,689 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.