Plymouth, MN vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN outspends Plymouth, MN by a wide margin per resident — $21,910 versus $8,877, a 147% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Plymouth, MN edges Minneapolis, MN on the Fiscal Health Score by 4 points — 69/100 (grade B) to 65/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Plymouth, MN carries the lighter load at $222 per resident versus $644 for Minneapolis, MN. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Plymouth, MN at $1,549 per resident and in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Plymouth, MN at 100% of total revenue, whereas Minneapolis, MN relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 59.5% more per capita than Plymouth ($13,033/person difference). Plymouth, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 69/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $613 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $149 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $7,979 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,754 | $2,040 |
| Other | $1,884 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $311 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $221 |
| Public Welfare | $820 | $1,500 |
| Hospitals | $345 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,549 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $2,036 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $570 |
| Utilities | $904 | $2,398 |
| Interest on Debt | $631 | $0 |
| Other | $2,281 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.