Minneapolis, MN vs Plymouth, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN outspends Plymouth, MN by a wide margin per resident — $21,910 versus $8,877, a 147% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Plymouth, MN edges Minneapolis, MN on the Fiscal Health Score by 4 points — 69/100 (grade B) to 65/100 (grade B). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Plymouth, MN carries the lighter load at $222 per resident versus $644 for Minneapolis, MN. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486 per resident and in Plymouth, MN at $1,549.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Minneapolis, MN at 17% of total revenue, whereas Plymouth, MN relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 146.8% more per capita than Plymouth ($13,033/person difference). Plymouth, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 69/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $1,989 | $613 |
| Income Tax | $994 | $149 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,929 | $7,979 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,040 | $1,754 |
| Other | $3,254 | $1,884 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $683 | $311 |
| Highways & Roads | $221 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,500 | $820 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $345 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,486 | $1,549 |
| Housing | $4,133 | $2,036 |
| Sewerage | $570 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,398 | $904 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $631 |
| Other | $8,919 | $2,281 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.