Overland Park, KS vs Olathe, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Olathe, KS outspends Overland Park, KS by a wide margin per resident — $14,735 versus $8,044, a 83% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Overland Park, KS edges Olathe, KS on the Fiscal Health Score by 1 points — 85/100 (grade A) to 84/100 (grade A). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Overland Park, KS leads with parks and recreation at $1,786 per resident, while Olathe, KS leads with health at $497.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Overland Park, KS at 10% of total revenue, whereas Olathe, KS relies most on other revenue at 12%.
Summary
Olathe spends 45.4% more per capita than Overland Park ($6,691/person difference). Overland Park, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 85/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $796 |
| Sales Tax | $861 | $992 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,135 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,045 | $2,471 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $1,283 |
| Other | $804 | $2,971 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $93 | $281 |
| Highways & Roads | $225 | $141 |
| Education | $0 | $35 |
| Public Welfare | $726 | $1,206 |
| Health | $0 | $497 |
| Hospitals | $427 | $470 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,786 | $456 |
| Housing | $2,095 | $2,111 |
| Utilities | $0 | $4,550 |
| Other | $2,690 | $4,988 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.