Olathe, KS vs Overland Park, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Olathe, KS outspends Overland Park, KS by a wide margin per resident — $14,735 versus $8,044, a 83% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Overland Park, KS edges Olathe, KS on the Fiscal Health Score by 1 points — 85/100 (grade A) to 84/100 (grade A). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Olathe, KS leads with health at $497 per resident, while Overland Park, KS leads with parks and recreation at $1,786.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Olathe, KS at 12% of total revenue, whereas Overland Park, KS relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 10%.
Summary
Olathe spends 83.2% more per capita than Overland Park ($6,691/person difference). Overland Park, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 85/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $796 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $992 | $861 |
| Income Tax | $1,135 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,471 | $1,045 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,283 | $0 |
| Other | $2,971 | $804 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $281 | $93 |
| Highways & Roads | $141 | $225 |
| Education | $35 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,206 | $726 |
| Health | $497 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $470 | $427 |
| Parks & Recreation | $456 | $1,786 |
| Housing | $2,111 | $2,095 |
| Utilities | $4,550 | $0 |
| Other | $4,988 | $2,690 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.