Omaha, NE vs Oakland, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Oakland spends 62.8% more per capita than Omaha ($18,874/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
B
72/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency43
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Omaha
Oakland
Total Spending
$5.5B
$13.2B
Spending / Capita
$11,180
$30,055
Total Revenue
$13.2B
$18.5B
Revenue / Capita
$26,929
$42,277
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
489,201
437,825
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Fire Protection
Omaha$0
Oakland$1
Highways & Roads
Omaha$319
Oakland$0
Parks & Recreation
Omaha$742
Oakland$955
Health
Omaha$456
Oakland$1,016
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaOakland
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $522 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $42,277 |
| Other | $4,672 | $4,337 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaOakland
| Fire Protection | $0 | $1 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $2,426 |
| Health | $456 | $1,016 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $2,498 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $955 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $7,811 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $1,417 |
| Utilities | $581 | $0 |
| Other | $4,516 | $13,929 |
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
B
Oakland, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 72/100
Good fiscal health