Oakland, CA vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Oakland spends 168.8% more per capita than Omaha ($18,874/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
B
72/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency43
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Oakland
Omaha
Total Spending
$13.2B
$5.5B
Spending / Capita
$30,055
$11,180
Total Revenue
$18.5B
$13.2B
Revenue / Capita
$42,277
$26,929
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
437,825
489,201
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Fire Protection
Oakland$1
Omaha$0
Highways & Roads
Oakland$0
Omaha$319
Parks & Recreation
Oakland$955
Omaha$742
Health
Oakland$1,016
Omaha$456
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
OaklandOmaha
| Property Tax | $0 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $522 | $373 |
| Intergovernmental | $42,277 | $2,622 |
| Other | $4,337 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
OaklandOmaha
| Fire Protection | $1 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $2,426 | $1,521 |
| Health | $1,016 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $2,498 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $955 | $742 |
| Housing | $7,811 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $1,417 | $0 |
| Utilities | $0 | $581 |
| Other | $13,929 | $4,516 |
B
Oakland, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 72/100
Good fiscal health
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health