Omaha, NE vs Mesa, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Mesa, AZ and Omaha, NE spend within 14.2% of each other per resident — $12,768 versus $11,180 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
On the CitySpend Fiscal Health Score the two are level: Omaha, NE and Mesa, AZ both land at 90/100 (grade A and A respectively), so the deciding factors sit in the underlying six-factor breakdown rather than the rolled-up grade.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Mesa, AZ carries $469 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Omaha, NE at $742 per resident and in Mesa, AZ at $953.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Omaha, NE at 17% of total revenue, whereas Mesa, AZ relies most on charges and fees at 9%.
Summary
Mesa spends 12.4% more per capita than Omaha ($1,588/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $47 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $463 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,376 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $1,383 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,334 |
| Other | $4,672 | $2,253 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $422 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $192 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $829 |
| Health | $456 | $147 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $537 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $953 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $4,190 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $38 |
| Utilities | $581 | $2,376 |
| Other | $4,516 | $3,082 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.