Mesa, AZ vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Mesa, AZ and Omaha, NE spend within 14.2% of each other per resident — $12,768 versus $11,180 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
On the CitySpend Fiscal Health Score the two are level: Mesa, AZ and Omaha, NE both land at 90/100 (grade A and A respectively), so the deciding factors sit in the underlying six-factor breakdown rather than the rolled-up grade.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Mesa, AZ carries $469 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Mesa, AZ at $953 per resident and in Omaha, NE at $742.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Mesa, AZ at 9% of total revenue, whereas Omaha, NE relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Mesa spends 14.2% more per capita than Omaha ($1,588/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $47 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $463 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $1,376 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,383 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,334 | $0 |
| Other | $2,253 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $422 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $192 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $829 | $1,521 |
| Health | $147 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $537 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $953 | $742 |
| Housing | $4,190 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $38 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,376 | $581 |
| Other | $3,082 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.