Omaha, NE vs Memphis, TN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Memphis, TN outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $22,111 versus $11,180, a 98% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 65/100 (grade B) for Memphis, TN — a 25-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Memphis, TN carries $303 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Omaha, NE at $742 per resident and in Memphis, TN at $1,397.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Omaha, NE at 17% of total revenue, whereas Memphis, TN relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Memphis spends 49.4% more per capita than Omaha ($10,931/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $10 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $496 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,218 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $34,065 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,077 |
| Other | $4,672 | $3,994 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $469 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $277 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $630 |
| Health | $456 | $391 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,677 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $1,397 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $4,683 |
| Utilities | $581 | $2,578 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,158 |
| Other | $4,516 | $8,850 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.