Memphis, TN vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Memphis, TN outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $22,111 versus $11,180, a 98% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 65/100 (grade B) for Memphis, TN — a 25-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Memphis, TN carries $303 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Memphis, TN at $1,397 per resident and in Omaha, NE at $742.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Memphis, TN at 100% of total revenue, whereas Omaha, NE relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Memphis spends 97.8% more per capita than Omaha ($10,931/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $10 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $496 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $1,218 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $34,065 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,077 | $0 |
| Other | $3,994 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $469 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $277 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $630 | $1,521 |
| Health | $391 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $1,677 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,397 | $742 |
| Housing | $4,683 | $3,045 |
| Utilities | $2,578 | $581 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,158 | $0 |
| Other | $8,850 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.