Omaha, NE vs Los Angeles, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Los Angeles spends 86.9% more per capita than Omaha ($74,252/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
D
47/100
Budget Balance0
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity65
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Omaha
Los Angeles
Total Spending
$5.5B
$331.6B
Spending / Capita
$11,180
$85,432
Total Revenue
$13.2B
$68.3B
Revenue / Capita
$26,929
$17,595
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
489,201
3,881,041
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Omaha$0
Los Angeles$4,111
Fire Protection
Omaha$0
Los Angeles$1,057
Highways & Roads
Omaha$319
Los Angeles$503
Parks & Recreation
Omaha$742
Los Angeles$1,347
Education
Omaha$0
Los Angeles$829
Health
Omaha$456
Los Angeles$409
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaLos Angeles
| Property Tax | $624 | $64 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $77 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $307 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $134 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $459 |
| Other | $4,672 | $9,048 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaLos Angeles
| Police | $0 | $4,111 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $1,057 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $503 |
| Education | $0 | $829 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $1,286 |
| Health | $456 | $409 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $2,135 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $1,347 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $6,325 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $34 |
| Utilities | $581 | $21,992 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $630 |
| General Admin | $0 | $11,586 |
| Other | $4,516 | $33,189 |
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
D
Los Angeles, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 47/100
Below average fiscal health