Los Angeles, CA vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Los Angeles spends 664.1% more per capita than Omaha ($74,252/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
D
47/100
Budget Balance0
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity65
Trend Direction50
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Los Angeles
Omaha
Total Spending
$331.6B
$5.5B
Spending / Capita
$85,432
$11,180
Total Revenue
$68.3B
$13.2B
Revenue / Capita
$17,595
$26,929
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
3,881,041
489,201
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Los Angeles$4,111
Omaha$0
Fire Protection
Los Angeles$1,057
Omaha$0
Highways & Roads
Los Angeles$503
Omaha$319
Parks & Recreation
Los Angeles$1,347
Omaha$742
Education
Los Angeles$829
Omaha$0
Health
Los Angeles$409
Omaha$456
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
Los AngelesOmaha
| Property Tax | $64 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $77 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $307 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $134 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $459 | $0 |
| Other | $9,048 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
Los AngelesOmaha
| Police | $4,111 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $1,057 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $503 | $319 |
| Education | $829 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,286 | $1,521 |
| Health | $409 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $2,135 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,347 | $742 |
| Housing | $6,325 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $34 | $0 |
| Utilities | $21,992 | $581 |
| Interest on Debt | $630 | $0 |
| General Admin | $11,586 | $0 |
| Other | $33,189 | $4,516 |
D
Los Angeles, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 47/100
Below average fiscal health
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health