Omaha, NE vs Las Vegas, NV
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Omaha, NE spends 23% more per resident than Las Vegas, NV: $11,180 against $9,085. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 82/100 (grade A) for Las Vegas, NV — a 8-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Omaha, NE at $742 per resident and in Las Vegas, NV at $1,028.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 17% of total revenue in Omaha, NE and 34% in Las Vegas, NV.
Summary
Omaha spends 23.1% more per capita than Las Vegas ($2,095/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $50 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $386 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $1,137 |
| Other | $4,672 | $2,806 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $945 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $280 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $45 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $705 |
| Health | $456 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $356 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $1,028 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $23 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $332 |
| Utilities | $581 | $129 |
| Other | $4,516 | $5,243 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.