Las Vegas, NV vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Omaha, NE spends 23% more per resident than Las Vegas, NV: $11,180 against $9,085. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 82/100 (grade A) for Las Vegas, NV — a 8-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Las Vegas, NV at $1,028 per resident and in Omaha, NE at $742.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 34% of total revenue in Las Vegas, NV and 17% in Omaha, NE.
Summary
Omaha spends 18.7% more per capita than Las Vegas ($2,095/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $50 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $386 | $373 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,137 | $2,622 |
| Other | $2,806 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $945 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $280 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $45 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $705 | $1,521 |
| Health | $0 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $356 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,028 | $742 |
| Housing | $23 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $332 | $0 |
| Utilities | $129 | $581 |
| Other | $5,243 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.