Omaha, NE vs Kansas City, MO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Kansas City, MO outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $22,820 versus $11,180, a 104% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 52/100 (grade C) for Kansas City, MO — a 38-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Omaha, NE at $742 per resident and in Kansas City, MO at $1,309.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 17% of total revenue in Omaha, NE and 835% in Kansas City, MO.
Summary
Kansas City spends 51.0% more per capita than Omaha ($11,640/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $623 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $7 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,794 |
| Other | $4,672 | $11,150 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $119 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $3,018 |
| Health | $456 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,849 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $1,309 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $4,681 |
| Utilities | $581 | $3,123 |
| Other | $4,516 | $8,721 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.