Kansas City, MO vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Kansas City, MO outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $22,820 versus $11,180, a 104% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 52/100 (grade C) for Kansas City, MO — a 38-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Kansas City, MO at $1,309 per resident and in Omaha, NE at $742.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 835% of total revenue in Kansas City, MO and 17% in Omaha, NE.
Summary
Kansas City spends 104.1% more per capita than Omaha ($11,640/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $623 | $373 |
| Intergovernmental | $7 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,794 | $0 |
| Other | $11,150 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $119 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $3,018 | $1,521 |
| Health | $0 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $1,849 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,309 | $742 |
| Housing | $4,681 | $3,045 |
| Utilities | $3,123 | $581 |
| Other | $8,721 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.