Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Kansas City, MO vs Omaha, NE

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Kansas City spends 104.1% more per capita than Omaha ($11,640/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Kansas City, MO
Pop. 505,958
C
52/100
Budget Balance1
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency76
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Omaha, NE
Pop. 489,201
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Kansas City
Omaha
Total Spending
$11.5B
$5.5B
Spending / Capita
$22,820
$11,180
Total Revenue
$675.4M
$13.2B
Revenue / Capita
$1,335
$26,929
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
505,958
489,201
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Kansas City$119
Omaha$0
Highways & Roads
Kansas City$0
Omaha$319
Parks & Recreation
Kansas City$1,309
Omaha$742
Health
Kansas City$0
Omaha$456

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Kansas CityOmaha
Property Tax
$0
$624
Sales Tax
$623
$373
Intergovernmental
$7
$2,622
Charges & Fees
$3,794
$0
Other
$11,150
$4,672

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Kansas CityOmaha
Fire Protection
$119
$0
Highways & Roads
$0
$319
Public Welfare
$3,018
$1,521
Health
$0
$456
Hospitals
$1,849
$0
Parks & Recreation
$1,309
$742
Housing
$4,681
$3,045
Utilities
$3,123
$581
Other
$8,721
$4,516
C
Kansas City, MO
Fiscal Health Score: 52/100
Average fiscal health
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health

Compare More Cities