Omaha, NE vs Jacksonville, FL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Jacksonville, FL outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $31,456 versus $11,180, a 181% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 53/100 (grade C) for Jacksonville, FL — a 37-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Jacksonville, FL carries $2,821 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Omaha, NE leads with parks and recreation at $742 per resident, while Jacksonville, FL leads with fire protection at $9,436.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Omaha, NE at 17% of total revenue, whereas Jacksonville, FL relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 14%.
Summary
Jacksonville spends 64.5% more per capita than Omaha ($20,276/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $10 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $233 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $762 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $7,348 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,119 |
| Other | $4,672 | $4,705 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $18 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $9,436 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $486 |
| Health | $456 | $332 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $557 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $1,329 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $5,572 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $176 |
| Utilities | $581 | $1,835 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,942 |
| Other | $4,516 | $9,771 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.