Jacksonville, FL vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Jacksonville, FL outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $31,456 versus $11,180, a 181% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 53/100 (grade C) for Jacksonville, FL — a 37-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Jacksonville, FL carries $2,821 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Jacksonville, FL leads with fire protection at $9,436 per resident, while Omaha, NE leads with parks and recreation at $742.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Jacksonville, FL at 14% of total revenue, whereas Omaha, NE relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Jacksonville spends 181.4% more per capita than Omaha ($20,276/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $10 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $233 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $762 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $7,348 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,119 | $0 |
| Other | $4,705 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $18 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $9,436 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $486 | $1,521 |
| Health | $332 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $557 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,329 | $742 |
| Housing | $5,572 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $176 | $0 |
| Utilities | $1,835 | $581 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,942 | $0 |
| Other | $9,771 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.