Omaha, NE vs Fresno, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Fresno spends 74.2% more per capita than Omaha ($32,207/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
C
50/100
Budget Balance0
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Omaha
Fresno
Total Spending
$5.5B
$23.5B
Spending / Capita
$11,180
$43,387
Total Revenue
$13.2B
$6.0B
Revenue / Capita
$26,929
$10,998
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
489,201
541,528
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Omaha$0
Fresno$3,261
Fire Protection
Omaha$0
Fresno$568
Highways & Roads
Omaha$319
Fresno$0
Parks & Recreation
Omaha$742
Fresno$76
Education
Omaha$0
Fresno$3,942
Health
Omaha$456
Fresno$599
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaFresno
| Property Tax | $624 | $337 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $19 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $501 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | -$4,470 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $11 |
| Other | $4,672 | $2,070 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaFresno
| Police | $0 | $3,261 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $568 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $3,942 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $1,946 |
| Health | $456 | $599 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $76 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $2,856 |
| Utilities | $581 | $15,340 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $255 |
| Other | $4,516 | $14,545 |
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
C
Fresno, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 50/100
Average fiscal health