Fresno, CA vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Fresno spends 288.1% more per capita than Omaha ($32,207/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
C
50/100
Budget Balance0
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Fresno
Omaha
Total Spending
$23.5B
$5.5B
Spending / Capita
$43,387
$11,180
Total Revenue
$6.0B
$13.2B
Revenue / Capita
$10,998
$26,929
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
541,528
489,201
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Fresno$3,261
Omaha$0
Fire Protection
Fresno$568
Omaha$0
Highways & Roads
Fresno$0
Omaha$319
Parks & Recreation
Fresno$76
Omaha$742
Education
Fresno$3,942
Omaha$0
Health
Fresno$599
Omaha$456
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
FresnoOmaha
| Property Tax | $337 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $19 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $501 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | -$4,470 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $11 | $0 |
| Other | $2,070 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
FresnoOmaha
| Police | $3,261 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $568 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $319 |
| Education | $3,942 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,946 | $1,521 |
| Health | $599 | $456 |
| Parks & Recreation | $76 | $742 |
| Housing | $2,856 | $3,045 |
| Utilities | $15,340 | $581 |
| Interest on Debt | $255 | $0 |
| Other | $14,545 | $4,516 |
C
Fresno, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 50/100
Average fiscal health
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health