Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Omaha, NE vs Colorado Springs, CO

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Colorado Springs spends 15.4% more per capita than Omaha ($2,042/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Omaha, NE
Pop. 489,201
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Colorado Springs, CO
Pop. 479,612
C
59/100
Budget Balance54
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Omaha
Colorado Springs
Total Spending
$5.5B
$6.3B
Spending / Capita
$11,180
$13,222
Total Revenue
$13.2B
$25.3B
Revenue / Capita
$26,929
$52,777
Total Debt
$0
$1.5B
Debt / Capita
$0
$3,063
Population
489,201
479,612
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Omaha$0
Colorado Springs$1,266
Highways & Roads
Omaha$319
Colorado Springs$0
Parks & Recreation
Omaha$742
Colorado Springs$376
Health
Omaha$456
Colorado Springs$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

OmahaColorado Springs
Property Tax
$624
$0
Sales Tax
$373
$257
Intergovernmental
$2,622
$6,902
Charges & Fees
$0
$5,676
Other
$4,672
$2,678

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

OmahaColorado Springs
Fire Protection
$0
$1,266
Highways & Roads
$319
$0
Public Welfare
$1,521
$575
Health
$456
$0
Hospitals
$0
$416
Parks & Recreation
$742
$376
Housing
$3,045
$2,713
Utilities
$581
$2,566
Interest on Debt
$0
$190
Other
$4,516
$5,120
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
C
Colorado Springs, CO
Fiscal Health Score: 59/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities