Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Colorado Springs, CO vs Omaha, NE

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Colorado Springs spends 18.3% more per capita than Omaha ($2,042/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Colorado Springs, CO
Pop. 479,612
C
59/100
Budget Balance54
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Omaha, NE
Pop. 489,201
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Colorado Springs
Omaha
Total Spending
$6.3B
$5.5B
Spending / Capita
$13,222
$11,180
Total Revenue
$25.3B
$13.2B
Revenue / Capita
$52,777
$26,929
Total Debt
$1.5B
$0
Debt / Capita
$3,063
$0
Population
479,612
489,201
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Colorado Springs$1,266
Omaha$0
Highways & Roads
Colorado Springs$0
Omaha$319
Parks & Recreation
Colorado Springs$376
Omaha$742
Health
Colorado Springs$0
Omaha$456

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Colorado SpringsOmaha
Property Tax
$0
$624
Sales Tax
$257
$373
Intergovernmental
$6,902
$2,622
Charges & Fees
$5,676
$0
Other
$2,678
$4,672

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Colorado SpringsOmaha
Fire Protection
$1,266
$0
Highways & Roads
$0
$319
Public Welfare
$575
$1,521
Health
$0
$456
Hospitals
$416
$0
Parks & Recreation
$376
$742
Housing
$2,713
$3,045
Utilities
$2,566
$581
Interest on Debt
$190
$0
Other
$5,120
$4,516
C
Colorado Springs, CO
Fiscal Health Score: 59/100
Average fiscal health
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health

Compare More Cities